You got my vote. As the world becomes more a networked cyber tool implementation, yep, anything that doesn't require physical attendance at some product or service location, sure, work remotely.

The energy footprint is drastically reduced, as is the maintenance and cost of unnecessary office space just to name a few obvious benefits for both work owners and the workforce. Those quickly implemented workarounds during the ongoing C-19 event revealed the advantages of remote work solutions.

Yes, some industries will be gone as remote work increases, such as service workers for the traditional at work crowd. Some of that might shift to delis at suburban grocers and others probably absorbed by automation and delivery services of goods and services. Warehouse malls instead of legacy malls.

IMO much of the sentiment opposing this remote work change is really, 'mental sentiment' or possibly 'habitual blindness' since when the cost side of this equation is no doubt decreasing as remote workers increase, then what's the problem?

Here in the US of A, we have a consumption mindset problem. As EVs, even zip cars, if even necessary, grow in numbers there are noises (literally) about changing over from fossil fuel chemistry engines. So here, unless living in a huge city, the concept of mass transit is treated more like some kind of communist plot, especially when auto manufacturers wind up their innuendo commentary regarding power train changeovers that are coming and how this all should be handled. So my solution to this, again if we even need cars, if you want to stay with fossil fuels, get yourself a suitable EV, buy yourself a 1000 watt sound system and get a dealership or point of sale noise sound package. Happy now, especially motorbikers?